35 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
35 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
layout: post
|
||
title: "Fast world, fast updates"
|
||
date: 2012-03-27 06:18:43
|
||
tags: [linux]
|
||
permalink: /blog/2012/3/27/fast-world-fast-updates
|
||
published: true
|
||
author:
|
||
name: Gergely Polonkai
|
||
email: gergely@polonkai.eu
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
We live in a fast world, that’s for sure. When I first heard about Ubuntu
|
||
Linux and their goals, I was happy: they gave a Debian to everyone, but in
|
||
different clothes. It had fresh software in it, and even they gave support of
|
||
a kind. It was easy to install and use, even if one had no Linux experience
|
||
before. So people liked it. I’ve even installed it on some of my servers
|
||
because of the new package versions that came more often. Thus I got an up to
|
||
date system. However, it had a price. After a while, security updates came
|
||
more and more often, and when I had a new critical update every two or three
|
||
days, I’ve decided to move back to Debian. Fortunately I did this at the time
|
||
of a new release, so I didn’t really loose any features.
|
||
|
||
After a few years passed, even Debian is heading this very same way. But as I
|
||
see, the cause is not the same. It seems that upstream software is hitting
|
||
these bugs, and even the Debian guys don’t have the time to check for them. At
|
||
the time of a GNOME version bump (yes, GNOME 3 is a really big one for the
|
||
UN\*X-like OSes), when hundreds of packages need to be checked, security bugs
|
||
show off more often. On the other hand however, Debian is releasing a new
|
||
security update every day (I had one on each of the last three days). This, of
|
||
course, is good from one point of view as we get a system that is more secure,
|
||
but most administrators don’t have maintenance windows this often. I can think
|
||
of some alternatives like Fedora, but do I really have to change? Dear fellow
|
||
developers, please code more carefully instead!
|