2015-08-27 23:37:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
layout: post
|
|
|
|
|
title: "How my e-mail gets to that other guy?"
|
2016-02-26 15:26:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
date: 2015-08-27 21:47:19
|
2015-08-27 23:37:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
tags: [technology]
|
|
|
|
|
published: true
|
|
|
|
|
author:
|
|
|
|
|
name: Gergely Polonkai
|
|
|
|
|
email: gergely@polonkai.eu
|
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A friend of mine asked me how it is possible that she pushes buttons on her
|
|
|
|
|
keyboard and mouse, and in an instant her peer reads the text she had in her
|
|
|
|
|
mind. This is a step-by-step introduction of what happens in-between.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### From your mind to your computer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When you decide to write an e-mail to an acquaintance of yours, you open up
|
|
|
|
|
your mailing software (this document doesn’t cover using mail applications
|
|
|
|
|
you access through your browsers, just plain old Thunderbird, Outlook or
|
|
|
|
|
similar programs. However, it gets the same after the mail left your
|
|
|
|
|
computer), and press the “New Mail” button. What happens during this process
|
|
|
|
|
is not covered in this article, but feel free to ask me in a comment! Now
|
|
|
|
|
that you have your Mail User Agent (MUA) up and running, you begin typing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When you press a button on your keyboard or mouse, a bunch of bits gets
|
|
|
|
|
through the wire (or through air, if you went wireless) and get into your
|
|
|
|
|
computer. I guess you learned about Morse during school; imagine two
|
|
|
|
|
[Morse operators](http://www.uscupstate.edu/academics/education/aam/lessons/susan_sawyer/morse%20code.jpg),
|
|
|
|
|
one in your keyboard/mouse, and one in your computer. Whenever you press a
|
|
|
|
|
key, that tiny creature sends a series of short and long beeps (called 0 or
|
|
|
|
|
1 bits, respectively) to the operator in your computer (fun fact: have you
|
|
|
|
|
ever seen someone typing at an amazing speed of 5 key presses per second?
|
|
|
|
|
Now imagine that whenever that guy presses a key on their keyboard, that
|
|
|
|
|
tiny little Morse operator pressing his button 16 times for each key press,
|
|
|
|
|
with perfect timing so that the receiving operator can decide if that was a
|
|
|
|
|
short or long beep.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now that the code got to the operator inside the machine, it’s up to him to
|
|
|
|
|
decode it. The funny thing about keyboards and computers is that the
|
|
|
|
|
computer doesn’t receive the message “Letter Q was pressed”, but instead
|
|
|
|
|
“The second button on the second row was pressed” (a number called scan
|
|
|
|
|
code). At this time the operator decodes this information (in this example
|
|
|
|
|
it is most likely this Morse code: `···-···· -··-····`) and checks one of
|
|
|
|
|
his tables titled “Current Keyboard Layout.” It says this specific key
|
|
|
|
|
corresponds to letter ‘Q’, so it forwards this information (I mean the
|
|
|
|
|
letter; after this step your computer doesn’t care which plastic slab you
|
|
|
|
|
hit, just the letter ‘Q’) to your MUA, inserts it into the mail in its
|
|
|
|
|
memory, then displaying it happily (more about this step later).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When you finish your letter you press the send button of your MUA. First it
|
|
|
|
|
converts all the pretty letters and pictures to something a computer can
|
|
|
|
|
understand (yes, those Morse codes, or more precisely, zeros and ones,
|
|
|
|
|
again). Then it adds loads of meta data, like your name and e-mail address,
|
|
|
|
|
the current date and time including the time zone and pass it to the sending
|
|
|
|
|
parts of the MUA so the next step can begin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### IP addresses, DNS and protocols
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Internet is a huge amount of computers connected with each other, all of
|
|
|
|
|
them having at least one address called IP address that looks something like
|
|
|
|
|
this: `123.234.112.221`. These are four numbers between 0 and 255 inclusive,
|
|
|
|
|
separated by dots. This makes it possible to have 4,294,967,296 computers.
|
|
|
|
|
With the rules of address assignment added, this is actually reduced to
|
|
|
|
|
3,702,258,432; a huge number, still, but it is not enough, as in the era of
|
|
|
|
|
the Internet of Things everything is interconnected, up to and possibly
|
|
|
|
|
including your toaster. Thus, we are slowly transitioning to a new
|
|
|
|
|
addressing scheme that looks like this:
|
|
|
|
|
`1234:5678:90ab:dead:beef:9876:5432:1234`. This gives an enormous amount of
|
|
|
|
|
340,282,366,920,938,463,463,374,607,431,768,211,456 addresses, with only
|
|
|
|
|
4,325,185,976,917,036,918,000,125,705,034,137,602 of them being reserved,
|
|
|
|
|
which gives us only a petty
|
|
|
|
|
335,957,180,944,021,426,545,374,481,726,734,073,854 available.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imagine a large city with
|
|
|
|
|
[that many buildings](http://www.digitallifeplus.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/new-york-city-aerial-5.jpg),
|
|
|
|
|
all of them having only a number: their IP address. No street names, no
|
|
|
|
|
company names, no nothing. But people tend to be bad at memorizing numbers,
|
|
|
|
|
so they started to give these buildings names. For example there is a house
|
|
|
|
|
with the number `216.58.209.165`, but between each other, people call it
|
|
|
|
|
`gmail.com`. Much better, isn’t it? Unfortunately, when computers talk, they
|
|
|
|
|
only understand numbers so we have to provide them just that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As remembering this huge number of addresses is a bit inconvenient, we
|
|
|
|
|
created Domain Name Service, or DNS for short. A “domain name” usually (but
|
|
|
|
|
not always) consist of two strings of letters, separated by dots (e.g.
|
|
|
|
|
polonkai.eu, gmail.com, my-very-long-domain.co.uk, etc.), and a hostname is
|
|
|
|
|
a domain name occasionally prefixed with something (e.g. **www**.gmail.com,
|
|
|
|
|
**my-server**.my-very-long-domain.co.uk, etc.) One of the main jobs of DNS
|
2015-08-31 14:06:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
is to keep record of hostname/address pairs. When you enter `gmail.com`
|
2015-08-27 23:37:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
(which happens to be both a domain name and a hostname) in your browser’s
|
|
|
|
|
address bar, your computer asks the DNS service if it knows the actual
|
2015-08-31 14:06:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
address of the building that people call `gmail.com`. If it does, it will
|
2015-08-27 23:37:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
happily tell your computer the number of that building.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another DNS job is to store some meta data about these domain names. For
|
|
|
|
|
such meta data there are record types, one of these types being the Mail
|
|
|
|
|
eXchanger, or MX. This record of a domain tells the world who is handling
|
2015-08-31 14:06:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
incoming mails for the specified domain. For `gmail.com` this is
|
|
|
|
|
`gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com` (among others; there can be multiple records of
|
2015-08-27 23:37:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
the same type, in which case they usually have priorities, too.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One more rule: when two computers talk to each other they use so called
|
|
|
|
|
protocols. These protocols define a set of rules on how they should
|
|
|
|
|
communicate; this includes message formatting, special code words and such.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### From your computer to the mail server
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your MUA has two settings called SMTP server address SMTP port number (see
|
|
|
|
|
about that later). SMTP stands for Simple Mail Transfer Protocol, and
|
|
|
|
|
defines the rules on how your MUA, or another mail handling computer should
|
|
|
|
|
communicate with a mail handling computer when *sending* mail. Most probably
|
|
|
|
|
your Internet Service Provider gave you an SMTP server name, like
|
|
|
|
|
`smtp.aol.com` and a port number like `587`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When you hit that send button of yours, your computer will check with the
|
|
|
|
|
DNS service for the address of the SMTP server, which, for `smtp.aol.com`,
|
|
|
|
|
is `64.12.88.133`. The computer puts this name/address pair into its memory,
|
|
|
|
|
so it doesn’t have to ask the DNS again (this technique is called caching
|
|
|
|
|
and is widely used wherever time consuming operations happen).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then it will send your message to the given port number of this newly
|
|
|
|
|
fetched address. If you imagined computers as office buildings, you can
|
|
|
|
|
imagine port numbers as departments and there can be 65535 of them in one
|
|
|
|
|
building. The port number of SMTP is usually 25, 465 or 587 depending on
|
|
|
|
|
many things we don’t cover here. Your MUA prepares your letter, adding your
|
|
|
|
|
e-mail address and the recipients’, together with other information that may
|
|
|
|
|
be useful for transferring your mail. It then puts this well formatted
|
|
|
|
|
message in an envelope and writes “to building `64.12.88.133`, dept. `587`”,
|
|
|
|
|
and puts it on the wire so it gets there (if the wire is broken, the
|
|
|
|
|
building does not exist or there is no such department, you will get an
|
|
|
|
|
error message from your MUA). Your address and the recipient’s address are
|
|
|
|
|
inside the envelope; other than the MUA, your own computer is not concerned
|
|
|
|
|
about it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The mailing department (or instead lets call it the Mail Transfer Agent,
|
|
|
|
|
A.K.A. MTA) now opens this envelope and reads the letter. All of it, letter
|
|
|
|
|
by letter, checking if your MUA formatted it well. More than probably it
|
|
|
|
|
also runs your message through several filters to decide if you are a bad
|
|
|
|
|
guy sending some unwanted letter (also known as spam), but most importantly
|
|
|
|
|
it fetches the recipients address. It is possible, e.g. when you send an
|
|
|
|
|
e-mail within the same organization, that the recipient’s address is handled
|
|
|
|
|
by this very same computer. In this case the MTA puts the mail to the
|
|
|
|
|
recipient’s mailbox and the next step is skipped.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### From one server to another
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Naturally, it is possible to send an e-mail from one company to another, so
|
|
|
|
|
these MTAs don’t just wait for e-mails from you, but also communicate with
|
|
|
|
|
each other. When you send a letter from your `example@aol.com` address to me
|
|
|
|
|
at `gergely@polonkai.eu`, this is what happens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In this case, the MTA that initially received the e-mail from you (which
|
|
|
|
|
happened to be your Internet Service Provider’s SMTP server) turns to the
|
|
|
|
|
DNS again. It will ask for the MX record of the domain name specified by the
|
|
|
|
|
e-mail address, (the part after the `@` character, in my case,
|
|
|
|
|
`polonkai.eu`), because the server mentioned there must be contacted, so
|
|
|
|
|
they can deliver your mail for me. My domain is configured so its primary MX
|
|
|
|
|
record is `aspmx.l.google.com` and the secondary is
|
|
|
|
|
`alt1.aspmx.l.google.com` (and 5 more. Google likes to play it safe.) The
|
|
|
|
|
MTA then gets the first server name, asks the DNS for its address, and tries
|
|
|
|
|
to send a message to the `173.194.67.27` (the address of
|
|
|
|
|
`aspmx.l.google.com`), same department. But unlike your MUA, MTAs don’t have
|
|
|
|
|
a pre-defined port number for other MTAs (although there can be exceptions).
|
|
|
|
|
Instead, they use well-known port numbers, `465` and `25`. If the MTA on
|
|
|
|
|
that server cannot be contacted for any reason, it tries the next one on the
|
|
|
|
|
list of MX records. If none of the servers can be contacted, it will retry
|
|
|
|
|
based on a set of rules defined by the administrators, which usually means
|
|
|
|
|
it will retry after 1, 4, 24 and 48 hours. If there is still no answer after
|
|
|
|
|
that many attempts, you will get an error message back, in the form of an
|
|
|
|
|
e-mail sent directly by the SMTP server.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once the other MTA could be contacted, your message is sent there. The
|
|
|
|
|
original envelope you used is discarded, and a new one is used with the
|
|
|
|
|
address and dept. number (port) of the receiving MTA. Also, your message
|
|
|
|
|
gets altered a little bit, as most MTAs are kind enough (ie. not sneaky) to
|
|
|
|
|
add a clause to your message stating “the MTA at <organization> has checked
|
|
|
|
|
and forwarded this message.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is possible, though not likely, that your message gets through more than
|
|
|
|
|
two MTAs (one at your ISP and one at the receiver’s) before arriving to its
|
|
|
|
|
destination. At the end, an MTA will say that “OK, this recipient address is
|
|
|
|
|
handled by me”, your message stops and stays there, put in your peer’s
|
|
|
|
|
mailbox.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
##### The mailbox
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now that the MTA has passed your mail to the mailbox team (I call it a team
|
|
|
|
|
instead of department because the tasks described here are usually handled
|
|
|
|
|
by the MTA, too), it reads it. (Pesky little guys are these mail handling
|
|
|
|
|
departments, aren’t they?) If the mailbox has some filtering rules, like “if
|
2015-08-31 14:06:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
XY sends me a letter, mark it as important” or “if the letter has a specific
|
2015-08-27 23:37:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
word in its subject, put it in the XY folder”, it executes them, but the
|
|
|
|
|
main point is to land the message in the actual post box of the recipient.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### From the post box to the recipients computer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When the recipient opens their MUA, it will look to a setting usually called
|
|
|
|
|
“Incoming mail server”. Just like the SMTP server, it has a name and port
|
|
|
|
|
number, along with a server type. This type can vary from provider to
|
|
|
|
|
provider, and is usually one of POP3 (pretty old protocol, doesn’t even
|
|
|
|
|
support folders on its own), IMAP (a newer one, with folders and message
|
|
|
|
|
flags like “important”), MAPI (a dialect of IMAP, created by Microsoft as
|
|
|
|
|
far as I know), or plain old mbox files on the receiving computer (this last
|
|
|
|
|
option is pretty rare nowadays, so I don’t cover this option. Also, if you
|
|
|
|
|
use these, you most probably don’t really need this article to understand
|
|
|
|
|
how these things work.) This latter setting defines the protocol, telling
|
|
|
|
|
your MUA how to “speak” to the post box.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So your MUA turns to the DNS once more to get the address of your incoming
|
|
|
|
|
mail server and contacts it, using the protocol set by the server type. At
|
|
|
|
|
the end, the recipients computer will receive a bunch of envelopes including
|
|
|
|
|
the one that contains your message. The MUA opens them one by one and reads
|
|
|
|
|
them, making a list ordered by their sender or subject, or the date of
|
|
|
|
|
sending.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### From the recipient’s comupter to their eyes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When the recipient then clicks on one of these mails, the MUA will fetch all
|
|
|
|
|
the relevant bits like the sender, the subject line, the date of sending and
|
|
|
|
|
the contents itself and sends it to the “printing” department (I use quotes
|
|
|
|
|
as they don’t really print your mail on paper, they just convert it to a
|
|
|
|
|
nice image so the recipient can see it. This is sometimes referred to as a
|
|
|
|
|
rendering engine). Based on a bunch of rules they pretty-print it and send
|
|
|
|
|
it to your display as a new series of Morse codes. Your display then decides
|
|
|
|
|
how it will present it to the user: draw the pretty pictures if it is a
|
|
|
|
|
computer screen, or just raise and lower some hard dots that represents
|
|
|
|
|
letters on a Braille terminal.
|