18 lines
827 B
ReStructuredText
18 lines
827 B
ReStructuredText
|
Do-Not-Track in IE10 vs. Apache
|
|||
|
|
###############################
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
:date: 2012-09-10 20:22:32Z
|
|||
|
|
:category: blog
|
|||
|
|
:tags: apache,technology
|
|||
|
|
:url: blog/2012/9/10/do-not-track-in-ie10-vs-apache.html
|
|||
|
|
:save_as: blog/2012/9/10/do-not-track-in-ie10-vs-apache.html
|
|||
|
|
:status: published
|
|||
|
|
:author: Gergely Polonkai
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
`Apache developer decided not to accept Do-Not-Track headers from IE10 users
|
|||
|
|
<http://arstechnica.com/security/2012/09/apache-webserver-updated-to-ignore-do-not-track-settings-in-ie-10/>`_,
|
|||
|
|
because it’s enabled by default. So… if I install a plugin that hides the fact from the web
|
|||
|
|
server that I’m using IE10, I become eligible of using it. But if I do this, I simply became
|
|||
|
|
eligible because I consciously installed that addon, so I could actually use it without hiding the
|
|||
|
|
fact. Sorry if I’m a bit Philosoraptorish…
|